Pammy!!!
By Pixel. Filed in administrative business, non-sequitur |
Hm. Over the past few weeks, I’ve noticed more and more people mentioning that they read this blog in day to day interactions.
Also, I’ve noticed my daily page views shoot up. I’m not quite sure what made this happen as I’ve not really done anything differently..
But that doesn’t matter right now.. what matters is…
Wednesday, October 26th 2005 at 23:29 |
Great, so that means everybody thinks I’m a brutal monster! That’s grounds for a slander case!
Thursday, November 3rd 2005 at 13:01 |
It’s only good in that by reading, you perform an act which maximezes the hedonic utilities for the greater amount of people, however my dear friend Carlos, might say that he’s only acting under the infuences formulating from the ethical egoism. Which in my book means he’s a sorry SOB
Thursday, November 3rd 2005 at 13:11 |
Dear Anonymous,
You are truly mistaken. Carlos acts only to pleasure himself? Are you nuts? Take for this page for example, just because he does this for pleasure, in reality has nothing to do with the moral statues you are suggesting through utilitarianism.
Thursday, November 3rd 2005 at 13:30 |
what does this have to do with the web page?
Thursday, November 3rd 2005 at 13:51 |
This is nonsense, this offers no proof that computers can even be a living, thinking life form.
Thursday, November 3rd 2005 at 13:55 |
Ah!!! I’ll give you that one, but can you offer me proof of your existence? How can you when neither modern science nor philosophy can explain what life is?
Thursday, November 3rd 2005 at 13:56 |
yeah but still…
Thursday, November 3rd 2005 at 13:17 |
So Danny,
You accept that he’s writing for the simple pleasures that results from the very act. What then if in utilitarian stage, showed light to an opinion that would allow both the readers and Carlos to receive Hedons (pleasures). And does this stray from the very nature that we call humanity? Doesn’t everyone want pleasure?
Thursday, November 3rd 2005 at 13:49 |
It can also be argued that DNA is nothing more than a program designed to preserve itself. I heard once that life, when organized into species relies upon genes to be its memory system, so man is an individual only because it’s intangible memory. The advent of computers and the countless amount of data has created a new memory system and thought parallel to ours.
Thursday, November 3rd 2005 at 13:39 |
You can’t say that, these days’ computers could be programmed to provide the same experiences resulting in the sensations under fire. Humanity’s defining attribution is not based on everyone trying to get hedons.
Thursday, November 3rd 2005 at 13:42 |
Okay, fine. Perhaps survival than, you can’t say that a computer would care for survival?