Pammy!!!

11 Comments

1. Great, so that means everybody thinks I’m a brutal monster! That’s grounds for a slander case!

2. It’s only good in that by reading, you perform an act which maximezes the hedonic utilities for the greater amount of people, however my dear friend Carlos, might say that he’s only acting under the infuences formulating from the ethical egoism. Which in my book means he’s a sorry SOB

3. Dear Anonymous,

   You are truly mistaken. Carlos acts only to pleasure himself? Are you nuts? Take for this page for example, just because he does this for pleasure, in reality has nothing to do with the moral statues you are suggesting through utilitarianism.

4. what does this have to do with the web page?

5. This is nonsense, this offers no proof that computers can even be a living, thinking life form.

6. Ah!!! I’ll give you that one, but can you offer me proof of your existence? How can you when neither modern science nor philosophy can explain what life is?

7. yeah but still…

8. So Danny,

   You accept that he’s writing for the simple pleasures that results from the very act. What then if in utilitarian stage, showed light to an opinion that would allow both the readers and Carlos to receive Hedons (pleasures). And does this stray from the very nature that we call humanity? Doesn’t everyone want pleasure?

9. It can also be argued that DNA is nothing more than a program designed to preserve itself. I heard once that life, when organized into species relies upon genes to be its memory system, so man is an individual only because it’s intangible memory. The advent of computers and the countless amount of data has created a new memory system and thought parallel to ours.

10. You can’t say that, these days’ computers could be programmed to provide the same experiences resulting in the sensations under fire. Humanity’s defining attribution is not based on everyone trying to get hedons.

11. Okay, fine. Perhaps survival than, you can’t say that a computer would care for survival?