Retraction to IeP 16
- by Pixel
It turns out that the person that originally posed last week’s question demands that I consider him the true winner. Well, we here at the Ind e-Pen don’t submit to terrorism. So blah!
Also, there is an ‘out’ where there should have been an ‘ought.’ I apologize. The spell check didn’t catch that discrepancy. Who would have thought that ‘out’ was a real word? Not me, surely.
Related posts:
- Ind e-Pen IV The Ind e-Pen +++vol+1++BT+4+++ Introduction: =============== Okay, because I didn’t feel like writing a real viewsletter this issue, I decided to just write a little bit of dialogue. Here you go. Hopefully the time I...
- Retraction to Ind e-Pen XII(i) I apologize, my journalistic integrity somehow ranked lower than making fun of Jcak this issue. It turns out he did not see three boobs. Here, he can tell it better: you got some wrong information...
- Ind e-Pen 2, #III, phoning it in. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>ind e-pen>>> << vol. 2 BT 3 < < <<<<<<<<<<<<<< i’m boycotting this. Who’s with me?...
Powered by YARPP.
It turns out that the person that originally posed last week’s question demands that I consider him the true winner. Well, we here at the Ind e-Pen don’t submit to terrorism. So blah! Also, there is an ‘out’ where there should have been an ‘ought.’ I apologize. The spell check didn’t catch that discrepancy. Who…